TristenC wrote:The downtime in a tower could be a particular boon, potentially providing easier access to reaearch materials, laboratories, various arcana; all the tasty bits mages usually drool over.
Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines. Spell research and the like is something that isn't really feasible in this game (due to funds and such). So this game would definitely make up for it.
BishGada wrote:Will there be NPC recruits available.
Like henchmen? Yes.
BishGada wrote:Suppose we deal with magic resistant creature, what will we do?
I didn't have any specific plans to use such enemies, but if it came up, I guess you'd all have to be creative about it.
BishGada wrote:Also how so many mages should get along? Mages, even good ones, not to mention bad ones, are problematic personals. They are very competitive and don't like to share their knowledge. It can get bad.
All of these mages, though, would be members of the Wizards of High Sorcery. They'll all know each other before hand, and may have even studied with or grown up with each other together in the tower. I'll probably have the group make their characters together, so they can decide their relationships with each other before we start.
BishGada wrote:I understand it is going to be on proboard forum?
Correct.
I wanted to clear up some stuff, regarding your last in character post, too.
BishGada wrote:"Mind you, I've broken no rule. It was all simulation and so were my actions.
BishGada wrote:And so my action must have been as real as possible to show my true self and how I would act in real life.
Am I misunderstanding this? Because it seems a contradiction. First, Tulbas says he shouldn't be judged on his actions during the Test because none of it was real, but then says that actions were as true in the simulation as they would have been in reality.
Also, Tulbas goes on and on about how important it is to save others, but then in the OOC section you state that Tulbas would not risk his own life for any of them. Are you saying here that Tulbas only pretended to care about the other apprentices because he knew he was being tested and that otherwise he wouldn't have bothered? Or was he being genuine?
The main concern, though, is whether Tulbas is going to one day try and go renegade. That is a big part of the Test. And Tulbas all but said he would. He justifies killing Magnus (despite mages killing each other in the tower walls being a huge crime) because he states that the Orders were falling apart anyway. This is basically admitting that he will abandon the rules of the Orders if he thinks they won't be enforced. (You can imagine using such a defense in the real world. "Yes, your honor, I did kill those people and loot those buildings before torching them to the ground. But to be fair, I only did it because I thought society was ending.")
This is what Ladonna meant by 'reckless.' At this point, the Council of Three is less worried about which Order to place Tulbas in than they are about whether he should be failed and killed before he becomes a threat to them all. The fact that he cannot seem to make up his mind on whether he is Good, Evil or Neutral only reinforces that idea. I'd describe his behavior at this point as Chaotic Neutral, which is the typical alignment of a renegade.
Also, I whole-heartedly disagree with your assessment that Raistlin was Good. He was unequivocally Evil. He believed that his intelligence made him better than everyone else, even his own brother. And that gave him to right to do whatever he wanted. He would have ended the world if he had not been stopped. Sure, he did good things now and again. But that didn't make him a good person. Nobody is 100% Good or Evil. Even a White Robe can be selfish at times. Even a Black Robe can feel love. It's their overall behavior that dictates their alignment, not their most recent action. Raistlin betrayed his friends, killed his brother during his Test (out of jealousy, no less, because he couldn't stand the idea that his brother was equal to him in any way), and then, as I pointed out early, came dangerous close to ending the world. Just because he was nice to a gully dwarf now and again did not make up for that.
Haahque wrote: It feels like "after this game is done" might be a few years down the line
Certainly not years. I intend to start increasing the downtime more and more, to quickly get through winter. Even so, there's always the chance the game will end prematurely, as well. There could be a TPK or we could all just decide to end it early.
Haahque wrote:Perhaps if I was able to make some sort of spell-blade
I'm not sure what a spell-blade is. Is it just someone who can use a sword and spells? Like a Fighter/Mage?
Haahque wrote:How much would he draw the comparison though?
I'm not sure. But there are similarities in how the Trade Guild was arrested and how Ismene was arrested. In both cases, there was no record made of the arrests. The army denies having arrested them at all. Normally when someone is arrested, they are put on a wagon and taken somewhere south, outside the city's walls. He might put together that if the Trade Guild was being held in the mansion instead, than Ismene might, as well. Just because she's not held in the same rooms doesn't mean she isn't held there at all. She is a magic user, after all. That likely warrants more security than just guest rooms with no bars or chains.
Haahque wrote:That idea mostly came from the fact that when Haahqae was about to leave his scouting mission and go onto plan #2 that he had for the day; someone official popped up and might have well have said (paraphrasing here) "There's a possible time limit now, so maybe focus on plan #1 and forget about plan #2 for now".
Fixed that for ya.
Haahque wrote: not the least of which being illusion-piercing dragon sight
I think you're forgetting how Haahqae was able to avoid the illusion-piercing dragon's sight himself. Dragons gotta sleep some time. Can't do that if they're guarding a prisoner.
Haahque wrote:That is rather strange. You'd think they'd advertise the execution so that anyone who's thinking about rebelling would see the brutality afforded to that idea and be scared off of it. Not advertising speaks to fear that it would be attacked, disorganization or an attempt to keep it secret. Not sure how to take this one.
It's a good point. On the other hand, a quick execution with little warning or fanfare would, as you point out, make it difficult for anyone to plan an attack and while there wouldn't be as many witnesses, word of mouth would ensure that the whole city learned of it pretty quickly.